Case 4109771/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr A Booth v NHS England — 2021
- Case reference
- 4109771/2021
- Decision date
- 12 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr A Booth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim of sex and race discrimination against NHS England. The claim form gave an Edinburgh address as the place where the claimant worked, which initially appeared to provide a basis for the Employment Tribunal in Scotland to have jurisdiction.
The claimant later clarified that the Edinburgh address related to Healthcare Improvement Scotland, described as his employer at the time, and was not connected to the respondent or to the claim. The respondent was NHS England, with a PO Box address and later a London head office address identified by the claimant.
The Tribunal found that rule 8 did not give the Employment Tribunal in Scotland jurisdiction because the respondent did not reside or carry on business in Scotland, the complained-of acts were not shown to have taken place in Scotland, and the Scottish address had no relevant connection to the claim or the respondent. It held that it could not transfer the claim because transfer under rule 99 assumes the transferring Tribunal has jurisdiction, and struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(a) as having no reasonable prospects of success.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) because the Employment Tribunal in Scotland found it had no jurisdiction under rule 8 to consider it. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(a) because the Employment Tribunal in Scotland found it had no jurisdiction under rule 8 to consider it. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- rule 8 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 12 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 99 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.