Case 4109806/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4109806/2019 Miss T Olabisi v Glasgow City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4109806/2019
- Decision date
- 27 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4109806/2019 Miss T Olabisi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and a strike out warning letter was sent after the claimant did not reply to a status enquiry asking her to confirm her intentions regarding the claim.
The correspondence was returned to the Tribunal Office indicating that the claimant no longer lived at the address given on the ET1. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had not provided a new address, leaving it unable to communicate with her or give notice under rule 38(2). In those circumstances, the tribunal assumed she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 38(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The listing category indicates Equal Pay Act and the judgment refers only to "the claim" being struck out, without describing the pleaded claim in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
- rule 38(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.