Case 4109860/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr R Smith v CCG (Scotland) Limited — 2021

Case reference: 4109860/2021
Decision date: 25 October 2021
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge L Doherty

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr R Smith

Respondent

CCG (Scotland) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

On 16 August 2021, following a preliminary hearing on 10 August 2021, the Tribunal issued an order requiring the claimant to lodge further specification of the claim and a schedule of loss by specified dates. The Tribunal later granted extensions on 26 August 2021 and 7 September 2021.

On 21 September 2021 the Tribunal reminded the claimant to comply with the order and warned that failure to respond could lead to strike out. On 6 October 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant until 20 October 2021 either to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

The claimant did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing. Employment Judge L Doherty therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment is dated 22 October 2021 and entered in the register on 25 October 2021, and it records no substantive merits determination or remedy award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim head(s). It records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.