Case 4110002/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110002/2021 Mr M Coull v N-Sea Offshore Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110002/2021
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110002/2021 Mr M Coull
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages, dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice, failed to pay holiday entitlement, and caused loss of employer pension contributions. It ordered payment of the specified gross or net sums for those heads of loss.
The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed because the Secretary of State had paid the claimant the statutory entitlement in full.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that employee pension contributions had already been included in the gross sum awarded for unlawful deduction of wages. | Upheld | — | £6,554 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages awarded as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £8,373 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement awarded as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £3,687 |
| Other | Loss of employer pension contributions; the judgment does not identify a more specific claim type. | Upheld | — | £1,166 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the Secretary of State had paid the claimant the statutory entitlement in full. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £19,780
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.