Case 4110021/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110021/2021 Mr L Milne v N-Sea Offshore Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110021/2021
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110021/2021 Mr L Milne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. The Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and awarded £3,253.49 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £5,276.68 net damages. The respondent was further found to have failed to pay holiday entitlement, with £1,639.17 gross awarded.
The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed because the Secretary of State had paid the claimant's statutory entitlement in full.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £3,253 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant was found to have been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £5,277 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,639 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the Secretary of State had paid the claimant the statutory entitlement in full. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,669
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.