Case 4110056/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G McGregor v TRJ Contract Builder Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110056/2021
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Sorrell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G McGregor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs G McGregor worked for TRJ Contract Builder Ltd as Chef Manager for Rolls at Roys from 15 February 2021 until she resigned by email on 26 April 2021. The respondent's 12 February 2021 email recorded a salary of £25,000 and a 30-day holiday package, and the tribunal found the claimant worked 40 hours a week over a seven-day week for a gross salary of £25,000, with net pay of £397 per week.
On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that the claimant's leave year started when employment commenced and not after any three-month trial period. It was not persuaded that a trial period had been discussed, and it did not attach weight to the respondent's evidence that holiday pay was not due because of the work involved after resignation. Applying the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal found the claimant had accrued 5.7 days' holiday over 10 weeks of employment and awarded £323.24, using a daily net rate of £56.71.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid one week's lie-in time at the start of employment. It held that this unpaid sum was not authorised by statute, contract, or the claimant's consent, and therefore amounted to an unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal rejected any claim for overtime pay because there was no evidence that overtime had been agreed.
The notice pay claim was dismissed. The tribunal found there was no breach of contract on the facts, and it said it could not consider constructive dismissal because no such claim had been presented and the claimant did not have the two years' qualifying service needed to pursue it. The total award was £720.24, made up of £323.24 holiday pay and £397 for the unpaid week's wages.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to accrued holiday pay from the start of employment. It rejected the respondent's suggestion that entitlement only arose after a 3 month trial period because that was not discussed with the claimant or set out in the 12 February 2021 email. | Upheld | — | £323 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had not paid one week's lie-in time at the start of employment and that the shortfall was not authorised by statute, contract, or the claimant's consent. | Upheld | — | £397 |
| Breach of contract | The claim for notice pay failed. The tribunal found the claimant was not entitled to notice pay on the facts and said it could not consider constructive dismissal because no such claim had been made and the claimant lacked two years' qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £720
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.27
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A, 14 and 16
- Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Stringer [2009] ICR 985
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.