Case 4110101/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 103598/2011 & Others (see attached list) Mrs S Bennett & Others v Represented by: Wright Johnston & MacKenzie Solicitors Inverclyde Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110101/2012
- Decision date
- 17 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 103598/2011 & Others (see attached list) Mrs S Bennett & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment of 17 August 2019, signed by Employment Judge Frances Eccles, concerns a multiple schedule of Inverclyde Council equal pay cases, including case 4110101/2012, Mrs Ann-Margaret McKinnon v Inverclyde Council. The judgment states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
Because the claims were withdrawn, the tribunal dismissed them under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claims, having been withdrawn by the claimants, were dismissed under Rule 52. The listed case includes multiple equal pay claims across attached schedules, but no separate substantive findings are given for individual claimants in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.