Case 4110117/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110117/2019 Miss C Jamieson v Dental Surgery Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110117/2019
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110117/2019 Miss C Jamieson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment because no response had been presented to the claim. On the material available, Employment Judge David Hoey determined that Dental Surgery Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss C Jamieson's wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £889.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. That claim was upheld and the respondent was ordered to pay £309.20.
The hearing listed for 1 November 2019 was cancelled. The judgment records no separate award breakdown beyond the two sums ordered, and the combined total from the two orders is £1,198.20.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £889 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £309 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,198
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.