Case 4110121/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4110121/2021 Open Preliminary Hearing Held in person in Glasgow on December and by CVP on December 202110 Employment Judge - A Strain Ms Y Walker v Represented by: Self Minster Care Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110121/2021
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
- Venue
- person in Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4110121/2021 Open Preliminary Hearing Held in person in Glasgow on December and by CVP on December 202110 Employment Judge - A Strain Ms Y Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge A Strain in Glasgow on 1 and 2 December 2021. The claimant, Ms Y Walker, was self-represented and the respondent, Minster Care Group Limited, was represented by a Tribunal Advocate. Oral reasons were given at the conclusion of the hearing.
The tribunal held that the claimant's impairments of stress and anxiety and trigeminal neuralgia were disabilities as defined by section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. It also found that the respondent had knowledge of the claimant's disabilities over the relevant period, with knowledge of stress and anxiety from February 2021 and knowledge of trigeminal neuralgia from June 2020.
The judgment records those preliminary findings only. It does not contain a liability determination on any substantive discrimination complaint or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Open preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that the claimant's impairments of stress and anxiety and trigeminal neuralgia were disabilities within section 6 Equality Act 2010, and that the respondent had knowledge of those disabilities over the relevant period. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.