Case 4110169/2019 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Robert Flannigan v Michael O’Shea t/a — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110169/2019
- Decision date
- 13 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Robert Flannigan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant had continuous employment from 28 August 1992, because the pub business changed hands over time but the fittings, equipment, stock, staff and customers were transferred and the business continued to trade. On that basis, there was a relevant transfer under TUPE and the claimant had 27 years of continuous service at the date of dismissal.
The respondent, who did not enter an appearance or lodge a response, dismissed the claimant by text on 24 July 2019 without reason, warning, prior procedure or notice. The tribunal found that the dismissal was unfair under section 94 and section 98 ERA 1996. It accepted that the claimant had taken reasonable steps to find alternative employment, was not claiming future loss, and had not been in receipt of benefits.
For remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £6,050 and a compensatory award of £3,520, made up of loss of earnings for 16 weeks after deducting the 12-week notice period already compensated separately and £350 for loss of statutory rights. Because issues of conduct had been raised, the tribunal found that the ACAS Code applied and that the respondent had wholly and unreasonably failed to comply with it, so it increased the compensatory award by 25% to £4,837.50. Separately, it awarded £2,640.20 for notice pay and £880 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as notice pay under the contract claim. The tribunal found the claimant had 27 years' continuous service and was entitled to 12 weeks' notice at £220 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,640 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair because the claimant was dismissed by text on 24 July 2019 without reason, warning, prior procedure or notice. The award comprised a basic award of £6,050 and a compensatory award increased by 25% for unreasonable non-compliance with the ACAS Code. | Upheld | — | £10,888 |
| Other | Statutory award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a statement of employment particulars. The tribunal considered it just and equitable to award the higher four-week amount. | Upheld | — | £880 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,408
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £6,050
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,838
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.218 ERA 1996
- TUPE Regulations 2006 regs 3 and 4
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.86 ERA 1996
- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
- s.123(1) ERA 1996
- s.207A TULRCA 1992
- s.221 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.