Case 4110233/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J McVey v Unrepresented Inverclyde Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 4110233/2015
- Decision date
- 11 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J McVey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs J McVey's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the extracted text, although the case was listed under the Equal Pay Act.
On 17 May 2018, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity either to provide written reasons by a specified date or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore concluded that the claim should be struck out. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The extracted text does not identify the substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.