Case 4110255/2019 · Employment Tribunal
J Sweeney v We (Glasgow) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110255/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F EcclesMr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Sweeney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of Mr J Sweeney's claim. Instead, Employment Judge F Eccles struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The reasons recorded that on 26 June 2020 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 July 2020, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded and no substantive findings were made on the underlying employment claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. On 26 June 2020 the claimant was given until 10 July 2020 to provide written reasons or request a hearing, but did not give an acceptable reason or ask for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.