Case 4110314/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110314/2021 Mr D Hamill v N-Sea Offshore Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110314/2021
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110314/2021 Mr D Hamill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £5,628.15 gross. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £7,968.65 net, and that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £3,958.50 gross.
The claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed because the Secretary of State had paid the claimant the statutory entitlement in full. The claim for a protective award remained sisted under the tribunal's earlier letter dated 29 April 2022.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £5,628 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages in the net sum stated. | Upheld | — | £7,969 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found failure to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum stated. | Upheld | — | £3,959 |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the Secretary of State had paid the claimant the statutory entitlement in full, applying the maximum amount of a week's wages under section 227(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,555
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Section 227(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.