Case 4110340/2021 · Employment Tribunal
in Glasgow on April 2022 Mr P Watt v Oak Industrial Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110340/2021
- Decision date
- 29 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen Held
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
in Glasgow on April 2022 Mr P Watt
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the second respondent was the claimant’s employer. It also noted that the second respondent had not entered a response to the claim, and judgment was therefore entered for the claimant under rule 21. On that basis, the tribunal determined the substantive claims without a contested hearing on liability.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,575.38. | Upheld | — | £2,575 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £9,417.60. | Upheld | — | £9,418 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £311.15. | Upheld | — | £311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,304
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.