Case 4110349/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4110349/2014 Mr C Copland v Tayside Contracts — 2025
- Case reference
- 4110349/2014
- Decision date
- 29 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge, L Wiseman Case Number: 4110349/2014 Mr C Copland
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 10 December 2024 the claimant was given until 24 December 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that issue. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type, referring only to "the claim". The gov.uk listing categories indicate unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but the judgment itself records only strike out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.