Case 4110360/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110360/2021 Miss K Shaw v Highland industrial Training Suppliers (HITS) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110360/2021
- Decision date
- 2 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110360/2021 Miss K Shaw
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to present a response to the claim form sent on 20 July 2021. On the material available, the Employment Judge decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing.
The judgment states that Miss K Shaw's complaints of unfair dismissal, breach of contract and holiday pay succeed. No separate findings of fact on the merits of each claim are recorded in this short judgment, because the decision was made on the papers in the absence of a response from the respondent.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a later hearing before an Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not enter a response. Liability was determined on the papers without a hearing, and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not enter a response. Liability was determined on the papers without a hearing, and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment; the respondent did not enter a response. Liability was determined on the papers without a hearing, and remedy was left to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.