Case 4110372/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Fox v Mr J Laming (Deceased) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110372/2019
- Decision date
- 6 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Sangster
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Fox
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid sums due on termination of employment. It found that she was entitled to £479.75, less deductions for tax and national insurance, for hours worked before termination and had not been paid that amount, which was a breach of the terms of her contract of employment.
It also found that she was entitled to £99.75, less deductions for tax and national insurance, for holidays accrued but untaken at the end of employment, and that this sum had likewise not been paid in breach of contract. The respondent was ordered to pay both sums to the claimant.
Finally, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £738.90 on termination, which she had not received. The respondent was ordered to pay that amount as well. The judgment records oral reasons given at the hearing and does not identify any additional remedy elements beyond these three sums.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded for hours worked prior to termination that had not been paid; the judgment described the non-payment as a breach of the contract of employment. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for holidays accrued but untaken on termination; the judgment described the non-payment as a breach of the contract of employment. | Upheld | — | £100 |
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded and ordered to be paid. | Upheld | — | £739 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,318
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.