Case 4110374/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Emilio Giacometti v Toni's Pizzeria West End Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110374/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R King
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Emilio Giacometti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for Toni's Pizzeria West End Ltd as head pizza chef from 2 July 2018 to 22 July 2019 on a salary of £28,000 per year, with normal hours of 45 per week and 28 days' annual leave. The tribunal recorded that the parties discussed pay and bonus before the employment started, including an email from the claimant proposing a 2% bonus on gross profit above 70%, but no final agreement on bonus terms was reached.
On pay, the tribunal found that the claimant regularly worked more than 45 hours per week, totalling 98.25 hours above that threshold, but that he had already been paid for those hours at the agreed hourly rate of £11.96. It therefore rejected the claim for unpaid salary or overtime. The tribunal also rejected the bonus claim because there was no agreement at all on bonus entitlement, and in any event the respondent's accounts showed gross profit of 56%, below the 70% figure the claimant relied upon.
The holiday pay claim succeeded. For the 2018 leave year the claimant was entitled to 12 days' paid holiday, took 5 days, and the tribunal found that the respondent repeatedly failed to engage with his requests and did not give him an effective opportunity to take his leave or warn him properly of the risk of losing it. Applying regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and referring to Kreuziger v Berlin, the tribunal held that he could carry over the 7 unused days.
For the 2019 leave year the tribunal found that the claimant accrued 16 days' holiday, took 7 days before termination, and was unpaid for the remaining 9 days. The tribunal awarded payment for 16 days in total at the gross rate of £11.96 per day, producing a gross award of £191.36, from which tax and national insurance deductions were to be made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claimant had been paid in full for the 98.25 hours worked over 45 hours per week, at the agreed hourly rate of £11.96, so no further award was due. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No contractual bonus agreement was ever reached. The tribunal also found that, even if the asserted bonus had been agreed, the respondent's gross profit for the relevant year was 56%, below the 70% threshold the claimant relied on. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that the claimant had no effective opportunity to take seven days of 2018 leave, allowed carry-over of that leave, and found that nine days of 2019 leave remained untaken at termination. Sixteen days at the gross daily rate of £11.96 produced £191.36. | Upheld | — | £191 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £191
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.27(1)(a) ERA 1996
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 13(9)(a) Working Time Regulations 1998
- Kreuziger v Berlin (C-619/16)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.