Case 4110396/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Jeyam Oral Care Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110396/2019
- Decision date
- 28 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms H Dowdles brought the claim against Jeyam Oral Care Ltd and was represented by Mr RR Russell, solicitor. The respondent was represented by Ms J Wyper, solicitor.
The tribunal stated that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or the underlying factual issues are recorded in the extracted text.
The judgment was issued by Employment Judge Alexander Kemp on 28 January 2020 and copied to the parties on the same date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text does not specify the underlying cause of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.