Case 4110428/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110428/2021 Mr D Marshall v Springkell Mansion House Hotel — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110428/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110428/2021 Mr D Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge F Eccles issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material on 14 September 2021. The tribunal found that Mr D Marshall had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded him £1,320.00, stated to be one month’s pay.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay Mr Marshall’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,001.78. The hearing listed for 29 September 2021 was cancelled. The judgment records no separate award for interest or other heads of loss, and the total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £3,321.78.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,320.00, described as one month’s pay. | Upheld | — | £1,320 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,001.78. | Upheld | — | £2,002 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,322
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.