Case 4110430/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110430/2019 and 4111566/2019 Ms J Turner v Heathfield Care And Residential Homes Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110430/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110430/2019 and 4111566/2019 Ms J Turner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment for case numbers 4110430/2019 and 4111566/2019 records only that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimant. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted text contains no substantive findings on liability, no identified discrimination or whistleblowing analysis, and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive legal type of this claim; it states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive legal type of this claim; it states that the claims were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.