Case 4110440/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Summers v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110440/2021
- Decision date
- 17 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Summers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed on 4 March 2021 after an incident in which one rear wheel detached from a bus and the other came loose while the bus was in service. The respondent investigated the servicing records, witness accounts and CCTV footage, and concluded that the claimant had signed a defect card stating that he had checked the wheel torque and refitted RIC clips when he had not carried out that work.
The tribunal found that conduct was the reason for dismissal. Applying the Burchell principles, it found that the dismissing manager genuinely believed the claimant was guilty of misconduct, had reasonable grounds for that belief, and that the respondent's investigation fell within the range of reasonable approaches, despite not being perfect.
The tribunal also found that dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses. It accepted that the respondent was entitled to treat the failure to carry out the assigned work and creation of a false written record as gross misconduct, taking account of the safety implications and risk to the respondent's operator licence. The claimant's personal circumstances were considered, but the tribunal found the respondent was entitled to conclude that adequate support had been available and that dismissal was fair overall.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed contrary to section 94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(2)(b) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
- Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Hitt
- band of reasonable responses
- British Leyland UK Ltd v Swift
- Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.