Case 4110446/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge N M Hosie Case No: 4110446/2019 Mr R Yuecel v Represented by: Hayat Rafique-Fayez Solicitor University Of Aberdeen — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110446/2019
- Decision date
- 14 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge N M Hosie Case No: 4110446/2019 Mr R Yuecel
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R Yuecel's claim against the University of Aberdeen was withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Nicol Hosie therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text, and no monetary award was made. The judgment is dated 13 November 2019 and was sent to the parties on 14 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the substantive heads of claim. It records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.