Case 4110463/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Total Pipeline Technology Civil Eng Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110463/2021
- Decision date
- 14 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for the period 3 May 2021 to 12 May 2021, and was ordered to pay £800.00.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £410.00, described as 1 week's notice pay on a net basis. In addition, the respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £1,020.00.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to give a statement of employment particulars and ordered payment of £1,000.00, described as 2 weeks' pay. The hearing listed for 4 October 2021 was cancelled. The total award reflected in the judgment is £3,230.00.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 3/5/21 to 12/5/21. | Upheld | — | £800 |
| Breach of contract | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; ordered as 1 week's notice pay, net sum. | Upheld | — | £410 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,020 |
| Other | Failure to give a statement of employment particulars; awarded as 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.