Case 4110502/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4110502/2021 Mr M Taylor v N-Sea Offshore Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110502/2021
- Decision date
- 8 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)Case No: 4110502/2021 Mr M Taylor
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and an Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It awarded the unpaid balance of 367.00 gross.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of 2,416.93 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment, with the unpaid balance awarded as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £267 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages as a net sum. | Upheld | — | £2,417 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,684
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.