Case 4110641/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Campbell v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110641/2021
- Decision date
- 7 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed on 29 August 2020 and brought a complaint of unfair dismissal. The preliminary hearing was limited to time bar. The normal three-month time limit expired on 28 November 2020, and Early Conciliation was not commenced before that date, so the statutory extension provisions did not extend time.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was unaware of the unfair dismissal time limit and believed, as did his trade union representative, that tribunal proceedings should wait until the internal appeal process had concluded. The Tribunal accepted that the claimant had depression, but found he would have been sufficiently well to lodge a complaint in time had the time limit been drawn to his attention.
The Tribunal held that the claimant was being advised by trade union officials who were skilled advisers for these purposes. Their failure to advise him about the time limit, and any unreasonable mistake or ignorance on their part, was attributed to the claimant under the Dedman principle. The Tribunal also found no special facts connected with the pending internal appeal, and no deception or misleading statement by the respondent, which made it not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. The complaint was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was dismissed because it was presented out of time and the Tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time; the Tribunal therefore held it had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Dedman principle
- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
- Wall's Meat Ltd v Khan
- Bhoda v Hampshire Area Health Authority
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.