Case 4110653/2015 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 103801/2010 & others (see schedule below) Mrs J Wilson & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitor Fife Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110653/2015
- Decision date
- 25 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 103801/2010 & others (see schedule below) Mrs J Wilson & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment dated 25 October 2019, issued by Employment Judge Ian McFatridge, records that the claims listed in the schedule had been withdrawn by the claimants. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability were made in this judgment, and no remedy or monetary award was recorded. The decision is a procedural disposal of the listed claims, including case 4110653/2015, rather than a merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The schedule lists Barbara Mitchell, case 4110653/2015. The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.