Case 4110660/2015 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 103953/2006 & others (see schedule below) Mrs J MacDonald & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitor Fife Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110660/2015
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 103953/2006 & others (see schedule below) Mrs J MacDonald & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ian McFatridge issued the judgment on 14 October 2019 in the proceedings that included case 4110660/2015, John McNab. The judgment states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings on the underlying merits are recorded in the judgment, and no monetary remedy is awarded. The schedule to the judgment lists the other cases covered by the same order, but the operative disposal for this case is limited to withdrawal and dismissal under Rule 52.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment text does not restate the substantive jurisdiction for this case, but the source listing categorises it as Equal Pay Act. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.