Case 4110663/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110663/2019 Ms SC Kirkwood-Wright v Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110663/2019
- Decision date
- 6 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110663/2019 Ms SC Kirkwood-Wright
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms SC Kirkwood-Wright's claim against the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, and the named individual respondents, had been withdrawn by the claimant. On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings of fact or liability are set out in the judgment text supplied, and no remedy was awarded. The decision is limited to the procedural dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not set out the underlying factual allegations or decide the claim on the merits. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.