Case 4110701/2021 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110701/2021 Held on May 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr S Sokol v John Clark (Holdings) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110701/2021
- Decision date
- 23 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hendry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110701/2021 Held on May 2022 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mr S Sokol
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 13 May 2022 before Employment Judge J M Hendry, sitting alone, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim against John Clark (Holdings) Limited for breach of contract/unlawful deduction of wages. The judgment states that the dismissal was for the reasons given orally at the hearing and that the claim was time-barred.
The tribunal did not determine the respondent's strike-out/deposit application at that stage. It reserved that application pending consideration of the claimant's Better and Further Particulars, which were to be lodged within 14 days of the judgment, and the respondent's response to those particulars, which were to be lodged within 14 days after that. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to the claim as a 'breach of contract/unlawful deduction of wages' claim and dismisses it as time-barred. The respondent's strike-out/deposit application was reserved pending Better and Further Particulars. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.