Case 4110714/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110714/2019 Miss K Anderson v BD 1971 Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110714/2019
- Decision date
- 29 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Young
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110714/2019 Miss K Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge James Young decided the case without a hearing on liability and cancelled the hearing listed for 27 November 2019.
The tribunal held that BD 1971 Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss Anderson’s wages. It ordered payment of £995.74 in total, comprising £647.64 for 22 July to 17 August 2019 and £348.10 for 18 August to 29 August 2019.
The tribunal also held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered £198 for 22 hours of holiday accrued but not taken at the date of termination of employment. The total award was therefore £1,193.74.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award split by period: £647.64 for 22 July to 17 August 2019 and £348.10 for 18 August to 29 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £996 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for 22 hours' holiday accrued but not taken at the date of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £198 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,194
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.