Case 4110731/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v HG Hotels Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110731/2021
- Decision date
- 11 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O'Donnell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in the absence of any response from HG Hotels Ltd. The tribunal determined the claim on the available material. The claimant, Miss E McGoldrick, had withdrawn the protective award claim and the later arrears-of-pay claim, and both were dismissed under Rule 52.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim; dismissed after being withdrawn by the claimant under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £770.82. | Upheld | — | £771 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim in respect of notice; damages awarded at £770.82. | Upheld | — | £771 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday entitlement; tribunal ordered £849.10. | Upheld | — | £849 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Any other claim for arrears of pay relating to the period from 01 June 2021 onwards was withdrawn after the claimant accepted the termination date was 31 May 2021, and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,391
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.