Case 4110738/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Mr N Puig Montella v BEEZER (PWA) Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110738/2021
- Decision date
- 26 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ronald Mackay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Mr N Puig Montella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing on 21 October 2021 before Employment Judge Ronald Mackay sitting alone, the respondent did not appear and was not represented. The claimant's application to amend the claim to include unpaid holiday pay was allowed. The tribunal then recorded that the claimant succeeded in his claim for unpaid wages, his claim for unpaid holiday pay, and his claim for recovery of pension contributions deducted from his wages by, and subsequently returned to, the respondent.
The judgment awards £6,734 net for unpaid wages, £441.80 net for unpaid holiday pay, and £469.51 for the pension contribution claim. In each monetary award, the judgment states that the respondent is responsible for accounting to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due. The extracted text records that oral reasons were given at the hearing, and that written reasons would only be provided on a valid request within 14 days; no written reasons are included in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment refers to this as a claim for unpaid wages and awards £6,734 net. | Upheld | — | £6,734 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's amendment to add unpaid holiday pay was allowed, and £441.80 net was awarded. | Upheld | — | £442 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment refers to recovery of pension contributions deducted from the claimant's wages by, and later returned to, the respondent; £469.51 was awarded. | Upheld | — | £470 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,645
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.