Case 4110754/2015 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos 114910/2010 & others (see schedule below) Ms M Britain & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors Fife Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110754/2015
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos 114910/2010 & others (see schedule below) Ms M Britain & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment lists multiple claimants and case numbers in proceedings against Fife Council. The case reference 4110754/2015 appears in the schedule for claimant Linda Dow under multiple 5135.
The tribunal recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. Employment Judge Ian McFatridge dismissed the withdrawn claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment is a Rule 52 dismissal following withdrawal. The gov.uk category indicates Equal Pay Act, but the judgment text itself only states that the claims were withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.