Case 4110756/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Shafiq v LABS Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110756/2021
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ronald Mackay
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Shafiq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a Cloud Video Platform hearing on 21 October 2021, Employment Judge Ronald Mackay heard Mr A Shafiq's claims against 8 LABS Ltd. Mr Shafiq appeared in person. The respondent did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim for notice pay was well founded and awarded £720. It also held that the claim for accrued holiday pay was well founded and awarded £504, and that the claim for arrears of pay was well founded and awarded £686.
The tribunal stated that each of the three awards was a gross figure. It recorded that the respondent was responsible for accounting to HMRC for any income tax or national insurance due on the payments. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and written reasons would only be provided if a valid written request was made within 14 days of the judgment being sent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was held well founded; award of £720 gross. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for accrued holiday pay was held well founded; award of £504 gross. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for arrears of pay was held well founded; award of £686 gross. | Upheld | — | £686 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,910
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.