Case 4110765/2021 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110765/2021 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr J Sim v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4110765/2021
- Decision date
- 5 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110765/2021 (V)5 Held at Aberdeen on November 2022 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr J Sim
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned a preliminary issue in complaints of disability discrimination: whether the claimant was disabled under s.6 of the Equality Act 2010. The respondent accepted that the claimant had a long-term physical impairment, Pectus Excavatum, but disputed whether it had a substantial adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities.
The Tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he became breathless when climbing stairs and when walking more than about a mile, and that he had given up football and other sports because of his condition. The Tribunal also accepted the respondent's evidence that its General Manager had not observed breathlessness or received complaints about it, and noted that the medical reports were based principally on information from the claimant.
Applying the statutory definition, guidance, the EHRC Code and cited case law, the Tribunal found that the claimant's impairment had an adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities and that the effect was more than minor or trivial. It held that the claimant was disabled within the meaning of s.6 Equality Act 2010 and that the Tribunal had jurisdiction to consider the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing determined disability status and jurisdiction only. The merits of the disability discrimination complaints were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability (2011)
- EHRC Code of Practice on Employment (2011)
- Goodwin v Patent Office [1999] IRLR 4
- Schedule 1 paragraph 2(1) Equality Act 2010
- Hutchison 3G UK Ltd v Edwards UKEAT/0467/13
- Aderemi v London & South Eastern Railway Ltd [2013] ICR 591
- s.212(1) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.