Case 4110781/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110781/2015 Mr H F Dickinson v RSA Accident Repairs Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110781/2015
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110781/2015 Mr H F Dickinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal in Scotland, with Employment Judge Robert Gall, struck out Mr H F Dickinson's claim against RSA Accident Repairs Ltd under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment is dated 9 November 2021 and was sent to the parties on 29 November 2021.
The tribunal recorded that on 22 October 2021 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 5 November 2021, or to request a hearing, so that the tribunal could consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No substantive merits findings or monetary award were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.