Case 4110788/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110788/2014 & Others Mrs A Archer & Others v McAlpine & Co Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110788/2014
- Decision date
- 13 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110788/2014 & Others Mrs A Archer & Others
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records multiple claims brought by Mrs A Archer and others against McAlpine & Co Ltd, with an attached schedule listing the individual case numbers and claimants.
The tribunal stated that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants. On that basis, Employment Judge Robert Gall dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states only that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The gov.uk listing category identifies Working Time Regulations, but the judgment text does not describe the underlying working time issue. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.