Case 4110797/2015 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 106887/2010 & others (see schedule below) Ms B Anderson & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitor Fife Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110797/2015
- Decision date
- 24 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 106887/2010 & others (see schedule below) Ms B Anderson & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a short disposal judgment by Employment Judge Ian McFatridge dated 24 July 2019. It records that the claims in the multiple case had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The schedule to the judgment lists case number 4110797/2015 among the claims covered by the order. The extracted text does not set out any separate factual findings, legal reasoning, liability determination, or remedy for that individual case.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment itself only records that the claims were withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52; the case context identifies this as an equal pay matter. No separate findings or remedy are given for this individual case in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.