Case 4110797/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110797/2021 Ms T Walker v Skoolz Out Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110797/2021
- Decision date
- 29 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110797/2021 Ms T Walker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material without a hearing. The decision records that the matter was determined on the papers.
The tribunal found that Ms T Walker had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £831.25, described as five weeks' pay. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,251.75.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £831.25, also described as five weeks' pay. The total amount ordered against Skoolz Out Ltd was £2,914.25.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £831.25, described as five weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £831 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £1,251.75. | Upheld | — | £1,252 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £831.25, described as five weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £831 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,914
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.