Case 4110801/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Collins v McAlpine & Co Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110801/2014
- Decision date
- 11 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant until 14 November 2019 to provide written reasons, or to request a hearing, to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so the Tribunal struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only states that the claim is struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it has not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Underlying claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category; the judgment itself only states that the claim is struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it has not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.