Case 4110817/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110817/2019 Ms A Ward v Koc & Koc — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110817/2019
- Decision date
- 18 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110817/2019 Ms A Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge Shona MacLean found that Ms A Ward had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered Koc & Koc to pay £1,056 in damages. The judgment records that this figure was calculated as 11 weeks' pay at £156 per week less 5 weeks' pay at £132 per week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,808.30, described as 16.5 weeks' pay. The hearing listed for 27 November 2019 was cancelled. No other remedy components were addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded for notice pay: 11 weeks' pay at £156 per week less 5 weeks' pay at £132 per week. | Upheld | — | £1,056 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,808.30, equivalent to 16.5 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £2,808 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,864
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.