Case 4110821/2019 · Employment Tribunal
4110821/2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4110821/2019 Preliminary Hearing Held by Telephone Conference Call on May 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr K Douglas v XS Transport Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110821/2019
- Decision date
- 26 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sandy Meiklejohn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
4110821/2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4110821/2019 Preliminary Hearing Held by Telephone Conference Call on May 2021 Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn Mr K Douglas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held a preliminary hearing by telephone conference call on 20 May 2021 before Employment Judge W A Meiklejohn. The claimant, Mr K Douglas, appeared in person and the respondent, XS Transport Ltd, was represented by Ms H McNulty, Litigation Executive.
The only claims referred to in the judgment were unlawful deduction of wages and holiday pay. The tribunal recorded that those complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant.
The tribunal therefore dismissed both complaints. No liability findings on the substance of the claims and no monetary award were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that this complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that this complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.