Case 4110822/2015 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos 4110822/2015 & others (see schedule below) Ms L Newsome & others v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors Fife Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110822/2015
- Decision date
- 4 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos 4110822/2015 & others (see schedule below) Ms L Newsome & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a schedule judgment in a multiple case concerning Ms L Newsome and others against Fife Council. The judgment records the individual case references covered by the schedule, including case 4110822/2015.
The tribunal did not determine the substantive merits of the claim. It recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and, on that basis, dismissed them under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no further findings on liability or factual disputes.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52. The claim type is classified as equal pay from the gov.uk listing category and case context; the judgment text itself does not restate the substantive cause of action. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.