Case 4110826/2021 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110826/2021 Miss H Stevenson v Tharaga Rajendran — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110826/2021
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4110826/2021 Miss H Stevenson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claim form was sent to the respondent on 18 August 2021 and no response was entered within the time required by the Rules. On the material available, the Employment Judge decided that liability could properly be determined without a hearing, but remedy could not.
The tribunal therefore found that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, unpaid holiday pay, unpaid wages, breach of contract, and breach of the Working Time Regulations succeeded. The judgment does not contain findings on the underlying merits beyond the respondent's failure to respond and the resulting Rule 21 determination.
The issue of remedy was left to be determined at a later hearing before an Employment Judge. No monetary award was assessed in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Determined on the papers under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to enter a response. Remedy was reserved to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded in the judgment as 'unpaid holiday pay'. Remedy was not assessed in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded in the judgment as 'unpaid wages'. Remedy was not assessed in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded in the judgment as 'breach of contract'. Remedy was not assessed in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded in the judgment as 'breach of Working Time Regulations'. Remedy was not assessed in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.