Case 4110846/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Blackhall v Mr A Duncan t/a Hairwayz — 2021
- Case reference
- 4110846/2021
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Blackhall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Blackhall was dismissed by Mr A Duncan t/a Hairwayz on 10 July 2021 by reason of redundancy. The tribunal accepted that the statutory redundancy payment due under the Employment Rights Act 1996 was £2,900.21, that £1,379.99 had already been paid to the claimant, and that the remaining £1,520.22 was transferred by the respondent to Alex M Adamson after he received a Schedule of Arrestment in Execution.
The tribunal held that earnings arrestments do not attach to statutory redundancy payments and that, although the Part IIIA arrestment regime under the Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987 could apply to the funds, the respondent was not authorised to pay the balance over immediately. In the tribunal's view, the money ought to have remained arrested in the respondent's hands pending further statutory procedure, or release under the Act, so the claimant's entitlement to the unpaid balance under s.135 ERA 1996 had been breached. The respondent was therefore ordered to pay £1,520.22.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had not provided a compliant written statement of employment particulars or compliant statements of changes under ss.1 and 4 ERA 1996. It accepted that section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 was engaged, but declined to add two weeks' pay because of the exceptional circumstances of the case, including that the £1,520.22 had already been applied against the claimant's debt to Falkirk Council and that a further increase would be unjust and inequitable.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy on 10 July 2021 and that the unpaid balance of the agreed statutory redundancy payment was £1,520.22. The respondent had already paid £1,379.99 to the claimant and transferred the balance to sheriff officers on 12 July 2021, which the tribunal found was not authorised by statute. | Upheld | — | £1,520 |
| Other | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to provide a compliant written statement of employment particulars or compliant statements of changes under ss.1 and 4 ERA 1996, but it did not add the section 38 Employment Act 2002 uplift because it found exceptional circumstances under s.38(5) and considered an increase unjust and inequitable. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,520
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.135 ERA 1996
- s.162 ERA 1996
- s.163 ERA 1996
- ss.73G, 73J, 73M, 73Q and 73P Debtors (Scotland) Act 1987
- s.38 Employment Act 2002
- s.38(5) Employment Act 2002
- Dalgleish v Lothian and Borders Police Board [1991] IRLR 422
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.