Case 4110867/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Piotr Redwan v - Student Adviser Strathclyde University Law Clinic Beam Suntory UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4110867/2019
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Piotr Redwan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 2 November 2020, Employment Judge Ian McPherson heard the parties on the claimant's opposed application to amend the ET1. The Tribunal granted the amendment in part only for the reasons given orally. During that hearing, the claimant's representative stated that the claimant no longer wished to pursue the complaint of unlawful direct discrimination on grounds of race under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant's representative stated at the preliminary hearing that the claimant no longer wished to pursue the unlawful direct discrimination on grounds of race complaint. The Tribunal dismissed that part of the claim under Rule 52 following withdrawal under Rule 51. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 51 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 98 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.