Case 4110885/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110885/2019 Mr J Campbell v Kids-R-Us Soft Play Area — 2019
- Case reference
- 4110885/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Claire McManus
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110885/2019 Mr J Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The respondent did not participate, and the listed hearing on 4 December 2019 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £57.47 in respect of 7 hours’ work. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £254.51 for 31 hours of annual leave accrued but unpaid at termination of employment. The judgment also allowed the respondent to deduct any required Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions before payment, provided the balance was paid to the claimant and the deductions were remitted to HMRC with written evidence given to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of 7 hours work. | Upheld | — | £57 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement, described as 31 hours of annual leave accrued but unpaid at termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £255 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £312
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.