Case 4110903/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110903/2018 Mr N Lobnitz v Noa Technologies Gmbh — 2018
- Case reference
- 4110903/2018
- Decision date
- 9 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Giles Woolfson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4110903/2018 Mr N Lobnitz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim form was sent to Noa Technologies Gmbh on 5 July 2018 and the respondent did not enter a response within the required time. Employment Judge Giles Woolfson decided that the claimant's complaints could be determined on the available material without a hearing under Rule 21, and the hearing listed for 26 September 2018 was cancelled.
The judgment states that the claimant's complaints of unpaid wages and expenses succeeded. On remedy, the judge awarded £15,347.01 for unpaid wages for the period January to March 2018 and £8,772.72 for expenses. The judgment records the overall sum payable as £24,119.7.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Complaint of unpaid wages. The tribunal awarded £15,347.01 for the period January to March 2018. | Upheld | — | £15,347 |
| Other | Complaint of expenses. The tribunal awarded £8,772.72; the judgment does not give a separate statutory label for this head of claim. | Upheld | — | £8,773 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £24,120
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.