Case 4110917/2014 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 4110917/2014 Mr R Love v Tradeteam Limited Tennent Caledonian Breweries UK Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 4110917/2014
- Decision date
- 12 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 4110917/2014 Mr R Love
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting with Employment Judge L Wiseman, struck out Mr R Love's claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 38(1)(d).
The reasons record that on 23 October 2024 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 6 November 2024, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it only records that the claim was struck out under rule 38 for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.